News
The Numbers Behind Central Coast Council's Digital Image Duplication Problem
UpdatedA quiet but costly data management issue is inflating the council's digital asset library and complicating the Gosford CBD renewal rollout.
News
A quiet but costly data management issue is inflating the council's digital asset library and complicating the Gosford CBD renewal rollout.

Central Coast Council is sitting on a digital asset library riddled with duplicate images — and the numbers tell a story that goes well beyond cluttered hard drives. An internal audit process, confirmed in council records tabled at the Gosford chambers earlier this year, identified thousands of redundant image files spread across the organisation's content management systems, slowing down everything from development application portals to the public-facing renewal content tied to the Gosford CBD revitalisation program.
The timing matters. Council is still clawing back credibility after emerging from state-appointed administration in 2022, and it has staked a significant part of its public-facing recovery narrative on the Gosford City Centre Master Plan — a program that depends heavily on updated digital communications, planning maps, and photographic records of streetscape upgrades along Mann Street and the Kibble Park precinct. When those systems are bogged down by unmanaged image duplication, the downstream effects hit public-information pages, tender documents, and heritage registers simultaneously.
Digital asset duplication is not a trivial housekeeping problem. In local government environments comparable in scale to Central Coast Council — which serves a population of roughly 345,000 people across the Gosford and Wyong local government areas — duplicated image files can account for between 20 and 40 percent of total storage consumption in content management systems, according to figures published by the Australian Local Government Association in its 2024 digital infrastructure benchmarking report. For a council that was placed under administration partly because of financial mismanagement, unnecessary storage expenditure is politically as well as operationally sensitive.
Storage costs at the enterprise level on the NSW Government's preferred cloud frameworks run at approximately $0.023 per gigabyte per month. At scale — and a council the size of Central Coast generates substantial photographic archives from planning inspections, infrastructure monitoring, and community engagement events alone — duplicated assets compound into thousands of dollars of avoidable annual expenditure. The Gosford waterfront redevelopment corridor between Georgiana Terrace and the Gosford Leagues Club site has been one of the most intensively documented projects in the council's recent history, generating image sets across multiple departments that were not consistently deduplicated before archiving.
The Wyong offices on Pacific Highway have faced a parallel version of the same problem, with heritage and environmental monitoring image sets for the Lake Macquarie border zone and the Tuggerah Lakes system stored in formats that predate the council amalgamation in 2016. Those legacy files were never fully reconciled with the post-amalgamation digital system, meaning the duplication problem has a ten-year tail.
The practical fix is neither cheap nor instant. Automated deduplication tools licensed for government use typically cost between $8,000 and $25,000 annually depending on library size and integration complexity, based on publicly available pricing from vendors listed on the NSW Government's ICT procurement panel. Council staff would also need to establish a consistent metadata taxonomy — something the Gosford planning department has reportedly been developing as part of a broader digital records upgrade linked to the NSW State Archives framework.
Residents who interact with council's online development application portal — the platform used for everything from a rear deck approval in Wamberal to a multi-storey proposal on Donnison Street — have periodically encountered slow load times attributed, at least in part, to unoptimised asset delivery. That is a concrete public-service problem, not just an internal IT headache.
Council's technology roadmap for 2025-27, referenced in its Integrated Planning and Reporting documentation, flags digital records management as a priority workstream. The deduplication audit fits within that broader program. How quickly the remediation moves from audit to implementation will depend on resourcing decisions made during the next quarterly budget review, scheduled for August 2026. Anyone watching Central Coast Council's recovery closely should add that agenda item to their calendar.
Spread the word
About this article
Published by The Daily Central Coast