Skip to content
The Daily Central Coast

Central Coast news, every day

News

Gosford's Duplicate Image Problem: How the Central Coast Stacks Up Against Cities Tackling the Same Headache

Updated

Councils worldwide are wrestling with outdated, duplicated property imagery in planning portals — and the Central Coast's approach reveals both progress and persistent gaps.

By Central Coast News Desk · Published 5 July 2026 at 5:51 am · 3 min read(680 words)

Verified by The Daily Central Coast editorial teamReviewed by our Central Coast editorial team. Last verified: 5 July 2026 at 6:15 pm.
Gosford's Duplicate Image Problem: How the Central Coast Stacks Up Against Cities Tackling the Same Headache
Photo: Photo by Ben Mack on Pexels

Central Coast Council is quietly working through a backlog of duplicate and outdated property images sitting inside its development application portal, a problem that has quietly undermined planning decisions on everything from Gosford CBD renewal projects to flood-risk assessments near Tuggerah Lakes. The images — some dating to surveys conducted before the council's 2020 exit from state administration — have in some cases shown demolished structures, pre-flood topographies, or simply the wrong site altogether when lodged alongside DA documentation.

The timing matters. NSW is in the middle of a push to accelerate housing approvals, with the Minns government under electoral pressure to show it can deliver homes faster. On the Central Coast, where Sydney commuters have driven median house prices in suburbs like Wamberal and Erina above levels many locals can afford, any friction inside the planning system carries direct economic weight. A duplicated or mismatched site image attached to a DA can trigger requests for additional information, adding weeks to an approval timeline that is already under scrutiny.

What Other Cities Are Doing

The problem is not unique to Gosford. Newcastle City Council in the Hunter began a structured audit of its electronic DA imagery library in 2024, cross-referencing submissions against NSW Spatial Services' aerial capture program to flag files where metadata showed the same image hash appearing across multiple unrelated properties. The City of Wollongong adopted a vendor-supplied duplicate-detection layer inside its TechOne planning platform around the same period, targeting a specific workflow bottleneck in its Illawarra Escarpment planning zone.

Internationally, the comparison is instructive. The London Borough of Hackney — which processes roughly 4,000 planning applications a year through its Public Access portal — piloted an automated image-deduplication tool in 2023, and by mid-2024 its planning team reported it had reduced requests-for-further-information linked to imagery errors. Hamilton City Council in New Zealand's Waikato region embedded perceptual hashing checks directly into its Objective ECM system by late 2024, requiring applicants to resolve flagged duplicates before a DA advances past the initial acceptance stage. Both approaches share a common feature: the fix was baked into the lodgement workflow rather than handled manually downstream.

Central Coast Council, which only emerged from state administration in October 2021 after a financial crisis that saw it rack up debts that required a rate increase approved by IPART, is working with a tighter technology budget than most comparable councils its size. Its current planning platform, also TechOne-based, does not yet carry the same automated deduplication layer Wollongong deployed. Council documents presented to the Wyong-area councillors in 2025 flagged system integration as a medium-term priority, though no public timeline for a specific imagery-checking module has been confirmed.

The Local Stakes on the Ground

In practical terms, the duplicate-image issue surfaces most visibly in two precincts. The Gosford City Centre, where the NSW Government's Gosford Activation Precinct work has been underway since the early 2020s around Mann Street and the Kibble Park surrounds, involves high-turnover DA lodgements for mixed-use developments on sites with complex demolition and subdivision histories. The second hotspot is the Tuggerah employment zone near Wyong Road, where industrial and commercial applicants frequently attach site photos that pre-date significant earthworks.

For applicants, the practical cost of a single request-for-further-information round trip can add between two and six weeks to a determination timeline, according to industry estimates published by the NSW Planning Institute of Australia — and legal and consultant holding costs during that window are real money for small developers already stretched by interest rates.

The most immediate step available to applicants lodging DAs with Central Coast Council right now is straightforward: cross-check every image file for duplicate filenames or metadata before submission, and confirm site photos are dated within 90 days of lodgement. Council's pre-lodgement meeting service, available through its Customer Service Hub on Mann Street in Gosford, allows applicants to flag imagery questions before a formal DA lands in the queue. Whether the council moves toward an automated system-side fix, or continues relying on manual review, will depend on budget decisions expected in its 2026-27 capital works deliberations later this financial year.

Spread the word

XFacebookLinkedInWhatsAppSend to a friend

Have your say

Loading comments…

Sources

About this article

Published by The Daily Central Coast

This article was produced by the The Daily Central Coast editorial desk and covers news in Central Coast. See our editorial standards for how we use AI.

Enjoyed this story? Get tomorrow's briefing free.

By subscribing you agree to receive emails from The Daily Central Coast and accept our Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.