News
Central Coast Council faces a ticking clock on how it handles outdated and duplicated visual assets across its renewal projects, with Gosford CBD and key community facilities at the centre of the debate.
Central Coast Council is confronting a backlog of duplicated and outdated imagery across its planning documents, digital platforms and public-facing renewal materials — and the decisions made in the coming months will shape how residents and investors perceive projects worth hundreds of millions of dollars across the region.
The issue has surfaced at a sensitive moment. The Council, which only exited financial administration in 2022 after a well-documented budget crisis, has been rebuilding public trust while simultaneously pushing forward with the Gosford City Centre Masterplan and a suite of infrastructure upgrades from Wyong to Woy Woy. Duplicate images — recycled renders, mismatched aerial photographs, and reused project visuals that no longer reflect current designs — have appeared across consultation documents and online portals, creating confusion among community members trying to track what is actually being built and where.
This is not a trivial housekeeping matter. Planning documents that carry stale or repeated imagery can trigger formal objections during public exhibition periods under the NSW Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, particularly when community members argue the materials do not accurately represent a proposal. For a council still rebuilding its credibility after administration, any perception of corner-cutting on transparency carries real political weight.
The Gosford CBD renewal corridor — stretching along Mann Street and into the waterfront precinct near Kibble Park — is the most visible example. Consultation materials for several development applications in that zone have drawn on image libraries assembled as far back as 2019, before significant redesigns occurred. The Leagues Club precinct at Gosford and the planned activation spaces near the Gosford Regional Gallery are both subject to current planning proposals where image accuracy is directly relevant to community assessment.
On the Tuggerah Lakes foreshore, near The Entrance, similar issues have emerged in environmental impact documents linked to climate resilience works. NSW is recording its warmest winter temperatures in more than a century — Sydney's June 2026 mean temperature broke a record dating to 1859 — and the urgency of coastal resilience planning on the Central Coast makes accurate, up-to-date project documentation more critical than ever.
Three choices sit directly in front of Central Coast Council administrators and elected councillors over the July-September 2026 quarter.
First, the Council must decide whether to conduct a formal audit of all public-facing planning documents currently on exhibition or under active community consultation. This would require assigning a dedicated resource within the Planning and Environment directorate — a body that, as of the 2025-26 budget, was operating with staffing levels that community advocacy groups have previously described as stretched, though the Council has not publicly confirmed specific numbers.
Second, and more contentiously, the Council needs to establish a clear policy on what triggers mandatory image replacement versus a simple annotation. The difference matters: a full replacement restarts some consultation timelines, which costs time and money. A notation process is faster but risks being seen as inadequate by community members who believe they were shown one thing and approved another.
Third, the Council must determine who signs off on visual material before it is published. Currently, responsibility appears to sit across multiple teams, including the Communications unit based at the Wyong administration offices on Hely Street and the development assessment team in Gosford. Consolidating sign-off authority — or at minimum creating a shared checklist — is a structural fix that costs relatively little but requires political will to implement.
The Gosford Waterfront Activation project, which has a completion horizon linked to the broader Hunter and Central Coast Regional Plan 2041, is the single highest-profile test case. Any document relating to that project that carries duplicate or superseded imagery before the next round of public exhibition — expected in the September 2026 quarter — will attract scrutiny from resident groups who have been engaged with the process for years and know the details well.
Council's next ordinary meeting, scheduled for late July 2026, is the first realistic opportunity for a formal resolution directing staff to act. If that meeting passes without a clear directive, the window before the next major exhibition period closes rapidly. For a region with an eye on fast-rail connectivity and a growing population of Sydney commuters making long-term investment decisions, the credibility of the planning process is not an abstract concern — it is a deciding factor in whether people bet on the Central Coast or look elsewhere.
Spread the word
About this article
Published by The Daily Central Coast