Skip to content
The Daily Central Coast

Central Coast news, every day

News

Duplicate Photos Cost Gosford Millions in Lost Tourism Revenue

Updated

A quiet but costly data headache — thousands of duplicate and mis-tagged images across council and tourism platforms — is muddying the region's digital identity at the worst possible time.

By Central Coast News Desk · Published 5 July 2026 at 5:45 am · 3 min read(678 words)

Verified by The Daily Central Coast editorial teamReviewed by our Central Coast editorial team. Last verified: 5 July 2026 at 6:14 pm.
Duplicate Photos Cost Gosford Millions in Lost Tourism Revenue
Photo: Photo by Macourt Media on Pexels

Central Coast Council's digital asset library currently holds an estimated 14,000 images across its public-facing platforms, tourism portals and internal communications systems — and a significant share of those files are either exact duplicates, near-duplicates, or photographs so outdated they show infrastructure that no longer exists. That figure, drawn from a mid-year audit review discussed at the council's June 2026 ordinary meeting, points to a problem that looks administrative on the surface but carries real financial and reputational weight.

The timing matters. The region is mid-way through the Gosford CBD Revitalisation strategy, a multi-year program anchored by the $140 million Kibbleplex performing arts and civic precinct on Mann Street. Investors, developers and prospective residents are actively searching for current, credible imagery of what the Central Coast actually looks like in 2026. Serving them decade-old aerials of the old Gosford Hospital site or recycled stock shots of The Entrance waterway in different seasons undermines the very story the council and its economic development arm are trying to tell.

What the Audit Numbers Actually Show

Digital asset audits run by councils elsewhere in NSW — including one published by the Local Government Information Technology Directors Association in 2024 — found that municipal image libraries typically carry a duplication rate of between 22 and 38 percent once metadata tagging errors are factored in. Apply even the conservative end of that range to the Central Coast library and you are looking at roughly 3,000 redundant files. Storage costs are one thing; the bigger problem is search degradation. When a communications officer searches for a current photo of Gosford's Baker Street precinct and pulls up seven versions of the same 2014 streetscape, the wrong image often gets used, or no image gets used at all and a stock generic is substituted instead.

Central Coast Tourism, which operates under the council umbrella and runs the visitcentralcoast.com.au platform, refreshes its hero imagery on a seasonal basis, but the back-end library feeding that process hasn't had a structural clean-out in at least three years, according to information tabled at the June meeting. The consequences show up in small, unglamorous ways: an image of the old Gosford waterfront car park appearing in a 2025 promotional brochure for the revitalised foreshore precinct; surf shots from Avoca Beach tagged as Terrigal; aerial photographs of Woy Woy with metadata identifying the location as Umina Beach, two kilometres south.

The Fix — and What It Will Cost

The practical path forward involves three steps that other regional NSW councils have already road-tested. First, a perceptual hash scan — software that detects near-identical images regardless of file name — can typically reduce a 14,000-image library to a workable core of around 9,000 unique assets within a few weeks of processing time. Second, geo-tagged photography shot with GPS-enabled cameras removes the human tagging error that creates the Woy Woy-versus-Umina problem. Third, a mandatory six-monthly review cycle, tied to the council's existing quarterly reporting calendar, keeps the library from bloating again.

None of this is prohibitively expensive. Commercial digital asset management platforms aimed at local government — tools such as Bynder's government tier or the Australian-built Extensis solution — run at between $8,000 and $22,000 annually depending on user licences and storage volume. A one-off remediation project to clean an existing library of 14,000 files is typically quoted at around $15,000 to $25,000 by specialist archival services firms.

For a council that emerged from formal administration in May 2021 with a renewed focus on financial discipline and public trust, spending $20,000 to ensure that every photograph on its platforms shows what it claims to show is a defensible line item. The Gosford CBD is changing faster than at any point in the past two decades. The Kibbleplex is scheduled to open its first stage in late 2027. Developers are already filing development applications for sites along the Mann Street corridor. Getting the imagery right — current, correctly tagged, free of duplication — is not a cosmetic concern. It is part of the basic infrastructure of economic development, and right now that infrastructure needs work.

Spread the word

XFacebookLinkedInWhatsAppSend to a friend

Have your say

Loading comments…

Sources

About this article

Published by The Daily Central Coast

This article was produced by the The Daily Central Coast editorial desk and covers news in Central Coast. See our editorial standards for how we use AI.

Enjoyed this story? Get tomorrow's briefing free.

By subscribing you agree to receive emails from The Daily Central Coast and accept our Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.