news
Dodgy Property Photos Are Costing Central Coast Buyers Before They Even Walk Through the Door
Duplicate and misleading listing images are distorting the local housing market at a moment when affordability is already stretched to breaking point.
How we reported this

Central Coast home hunters are increasingly encountering a frustrating and potentially costly problem: property listings on major real estate platforms that recycle old photographs, swap images between different addresses, or display stock shots that bear no resemblance to what buyers eventually inspect in person. The practice, broadly described as duplicate image replacement, is drawing fresh scrutiny as housing pressure on the coast intensifies and first-time buyers operate on margins too thin to absorb wasted inspection trips or, worse, misinformed offers.
The timing is not accidental. Sydney's housing stress is pushing more buyers north along the M1, with Gosford, Wyong, and Warnervale absorbing growing demand from families priced out of the northern suburbs. The Central Coast Council has been working through its renewal agenda since emerging from state administration in 2023, and the Gosford CBD revitalisation, centred on Mann Street and the waterfront precinct, has lifted expectations and, with them, asking prices. In that environment, a photograph that misrepresents a property's condition, aspect, or even its street address can translate directly into financial harm.
What Duplicate Images Actually Look Like on the Ground
The problem takes several forms. Some listings carry photographs pulled from a previous sale of the same property, images that predate a kitchen renovation, a flood event, or several years of wear. Others, particularly in strata complexes, show unit interiors that belong to a different floor or orientation within the same building. Real estate platforms including Domain and realestate.com.au have policies requiring accurate representation, but enforcement relies largely on complaints rather than pre-publication checks.
In suburbs like Terrigal and Erina, where median house prices have climbed sharply since 2021, the gap between a flattering archive photo and the current reality of a property can represent tens of thousands of dollars in buyer miscalculation. NSW Fair Trading handles complaints about misleading property advertising under the Property and Stock Agents Act 2002, and residents can lodge formal complaints through its online portal or by visiting the Gosford Service Centre on Donnison Street. The agency does not publicly report how many Central Coast-specific complaints it receives each year, so the true scale locally is difficult to pin down.
NSW Fair Trading's general guidance is clear that agents must not use images that are likely to mislead a consumer about a property's characteristics. That standard, however, is tested when images are technically of the correct address but show a condition that no longer exists, a nuance that makes enforcement complicated and slow.
What Buyers Can Do Right Now
The practical burden, for the moment, falls on buyers. The Central Coast Tenants' Advice and Advocacy Service, based in Gosford, has been fielding questions from prospective purchasers and renters alike about how to challenge listings they believe are inaccurate. Their first piece of general advice, consistent with Fair Trading's own published guidance, is to request a full photo disclosure date from the agent before making an offer, and to cross-reference listing images against council records and Google Street View history where possible.
Buyers using a conveyancer or solicitor should also instruct them to flag any material discrepancy between marketing images and the Section 32 vendor statement, which must accurately disclose the property's legal and physical status. Law firms operating out of Gosford and Erina have reported, in general industry terms, not specific case disclosures, that image-related disputes tend to emerge post-exchange, when the cost of unwinding a deal is highest.
For the Central Coast, where the median house price in the March 2025 quarter sat around $870,000 according to CoreLogic's published data, even a 2 per cent misjudgment driven by a misleading photograph represents more than $17,000. That is not an abstract risk for a buyer already stretching to cover a deposit and stamp duty.
The most immediate step for anyone currently searching is simple: if the listing photos look suspiciously pristine for an older property in Woy Woy, Long Jetty, or The Entrance, ask the agent directly when the images were taken. Agents are legally required to answer honestly. If the answer is unsatisfactory, contact NSW Fair Trading before, not after, signing anything.